Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2012, 17:22
Florek is getting better and better, next level is Sado, if you can defeat him you are in my top 100, Florek!
Knights and Merchants.net Forum
Talk about Knights and Merchants!
https://knightsandmerchants.net:443/forum/
Results of multiplayer games
https://knightsandmerchants.net:443/forum/viewtopic.php?t=832
Page 26 of 42
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2012, 17:45
does that mean sado is on number 100 and will be kicked out soon?
does that mean sado is on number 100 and will be kicked out soon?
does that mean sado is on number 100 and will be kicked out soon?
Dicso you troll omg
Anyway I guess that Florek will be simply "above sado's level". Not much.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2012, 19:52
I built 1 Inn only, first I've got no place then I just forgot - results are easy to observe after peace time (no troops production and mass starvation - at worst part only 60 serfs remained, from initial 90).
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2012, 20:00
Florek is getting better and better, next level is Sado, if you can defeat him you are in my top 100, Florek!
At start I thought, that he will come with 100 of army and run in my city, but it wasnt so.
So you mean sado is better than Florek?
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2012, 09:36
I will never play 1v1 with Florek, my 100. place on Matt's list isn't worth the risk!
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2012, 12:18
Tree+ random
65min 16farms and lots of horse and million spamming.
65min 16farms and lots of horse and million spamming.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2012, 16:23
Strange game, realy strange. I was realy surprised that you didn't starve to death, seeing how you spammed citizens early in the game doing.
Same with your wood, you had 40 builders and only 5 woodcutters. It's true that I have too much wood with 12 early woodcutters, but 5?
Then the red player was pretty funny, 33 horses at the end of the game in the baracks, what a waste.
Same with your wood, you had 40 builders and only 5 woodcutters. It's true that I have too much wood with 12 early woodcutters, but 5?
Then the red player was pretty funny, 33 horses at the end of the game in the baracks, what a waste.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2012, 17:49
Strange game, realy strange. I was realy surprised that you didn't starve to death, seeing how you spammed citizens early in the game doing.
Same with your wood, you had 40 builders and only 5 woodcutters. It's true that I have too much wood with 12 early woodcutters, but 5?
Then the red player was pretty funny, 33 horses at the end of the game in the baracks, what a waste.
Where do you get space for 12 maybe they don`t have even space to put tree its really important that wood cuter have lots of space where to plant trees.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2012, 19:18
Haha don't worry about my woodcutters not being efficiënt. 
But yes on a map like cursed ravine I don't have space for 16 farms,
but still usualy I place woodcutters on the corners, in the mountains, behind the mountain...
So on places where I wouldn't build anything else.
But yes on a map like cursed ravine I don't have space for 16 farms,
but still usualy I place woodcutters on the corners, in the mountains, behind the mountain...
So on places where I wouldn't build anything else.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012, 13:51
Cursed Ravine long nice game.
The funny part is that in this game i had only one citizen dead!
The funny part is that in this game i had only one citizen dead!
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012, 15:42
I'm very dissapointed about north team, composed by Rave, Mike, Maslo, Pyrit.
Nice bases sure (except Pyrit), but -1 combat skills and -1 teamwork.
They used troops really bad, and did lots of individual mistakes.
If north team had attacked together at first minutes, they would have won (even being 3v4 without Pyrit).
Nice bases sure (except Pyrit), but -1 combat skills and -1 teamwork.
They used troops really bad, and did lots of individual mistakes.
If north team had attacked together at first minutes, they would have won (even being 3v4 without Pyrit).
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012, 16:13
I'm very disappointed about this replay. Perforator uses his allies space. Bloodtree, you keep building food production while you got way more than you need already. And btw militia rush can beat your tactic easily. Rave attacked too soon or mike came too late. And so on..
About the bases, I'm not impressed by them.
About the bases, I'm not impressed by them.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2012, 18:03
I had ~20 swordsman all the time in barrack and i never had to make them 
lots of food its only great coz you can trade it for iron and for other resources and you can feed your army too.
It was short run vs long run and if short run can`t beat long run at first fight later it will be much harder.
lots of food its only great coz you can trade it for iron and for other resources and you can feed your army too.
It was short run vs long run and if short run can`t beat long run at first fight later it will be much harder.
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2012, 22:11
I must say that this is by far my best game. I'm not sure how I did it, but I finally breached the 5000 mark on wares produced. I was told that I was "really good" by one of my teammates, just to put extra icing on the sweet victory
This might sound like I'm bragging, but I'm really excited about this! Maybe I can be a "veteran player" someday
This might sound like I'm bragging, but I'm really excited about this! Maybe I can be a "veteran player" someday
Re: Results of multiplayer games
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2012, 22:20
Number of wares produced solely depends on the duration of the game. I don't have time to watch a replay now, could you perhaps upload a screenshot of the statistics?