Page 3 of 14

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 07 Jun 2012, 11:18
by NL Vortex Damage
Hey powel1

I know that guy, spartacus, he is fake.
I have the same expieriences as you.
Watch out for those guys ;-)

Laterzz And peace

NL Vortex Damage;-)

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be
Hey, today i have played with Sreba, to train to the tournament.
We have played against 2 British people.
One of them is gone after 30 min. after start.
We asked the other, that he will play alone or we should stop. No answer.
Than after PT, iám going to his village. Nothing-->2 stonemen,1 woodcutter and 2 towers. nothing like: "i´m afk" or that he would gone..no, he lets the PC on and are going shopping or what else. -.-

His name: "Spartacus" [British Flag]
I hate some games -.-

Maybe new feature of the remake. if one player dont do after 10 min. nothing..than message, or sth like that?


pawel95

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 10:37
by Beerzoeper
Warning for some polish idiots. Playing at BD Rivers loc 2, (with running iron production), a hard loc with not much building space, i build my barracks on the bridge. Loc 3 'radziopoke', the worst player of the game (stats below) builded 4 towers next to my barracks and started killing my people. ''mhm' left after 55 mins, and scouted my land with his builders. Kamykos, which i thought was a good and fair player, didn't took action to his cheating allies. So if you see these idiots, kick them!!

EDIT: I'm sorry for blaming you, Kamykos, this was not your fault.
Image
Image

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 10:58
by The Dark Lord
Scouting with builders is lame and so is leaving in the middle of a game, but you're building your barracks on 'his' land and it makes sense that people build towers there. What should he have done? 'Oh, Beerzoeper is there first, I'll just make towers a little lower although I'll need more than 10 to achieve the same effect as building 2 at the narrow entrance'. The map's name is Border Rivers and I think you went past your border here. :P

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 11:01
by Kamykos
Warning for some polish idiots. Playing at BD Rivers loc 2, (with running iron production), a hard loc with not much building space, i build my barracks on the bridge. Loc 3 'radziopoke', the worst player of the game (stats below) builded 4 towers next to my barracks and started killing my people. ''mhm' left after 55 mins, and scouted my land with his builders. 'Kamykos', which i thought was a good and fair player, didn't took action to his cheating allies. So if you see these idiots, kick them!!
Image
Image
I felt a bit offended by this words. I told my ally to close the towers but he didnt listen to me. I couldnt do nothing.
Mhm told us he had to go because his girlfriend had car accident.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 11:13
by Da Revolution
Beerzoeper is allowed to build there. (i've seen buildings that crossed the "border" way more. It's sad the other guy did build towers there though . it looks like he did build towards it to block you.

You can't blame kamykos.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 11:17
by Beerzoeper
he build those towers AFTER my barracks were there.... And people always take a bit of the loc 3 and 4 territory. And, if you were a normal player, you just build a good town yourself, instead of a crazy long road to build towers at my barracks.

oh sorry kamykos, i didn't know that, i just was in a rage because of this tower stuff. i will edit my post:)

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 11:33
by Beerzoeper
The Dark Lord, i think in KaM your 'territory' is the place you put buildings on. Towers are made for protect your territory, not to make territory. I understand your point, but i think the rule 'dont build towers next to you opponants buildings' is more important then the fact i took some land on his plot. the loc 3,4 plot is way, way bigger then loc 1,2 and i used almost all territory, exept the landbridge to loc 7,8, my allies. Building there is very unefficient, because of the long distances.
Finally, if you compare loc 2 and loc 3, we have to say that loc 3 is in a big advantage, he only has to build more towers, but his recources are closer and he can build his buildings closer together.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 08 Jun 2012, 14:32
by Lewin
I kind of agree with The Dark Lord, it's aggressive of you to build out over that bridge. You can argue either way, that land is kind of past your river border and inside his area, but it's hard to define where his area starts and ends.
The bottom right position of the map are very open and hard to defend but has lots of area to build. The bottom left of the map is very easy to defend but has little area to build.

Building towers next to an enemy building AFTER it has been finished during peacetime is not acceptable in my opinion, unless that person is building inside your area, and in this case it's hard to say whose area it is. Because the land is between your two areas if you both reached it at about the same time then I don't think it's a problem to build towers there, but it's never a nice situation that leads to good gameplay (for example, the iron in the corners of Road of the Valley usually leads to ugly tower wars)

So I would say that 'radziopoke' did the wrong thing, but I guess he thought you did the wrong thing first by building inside "his area".

If Mhm's girlfriend was in a car crash then I hope she's okay and there's no problem with him leaving. Maybe he was inventing an excuse but you have no way to know that, so unless you've seen him make excuses to leave on multiple occasions then you can't really say he did anything wrong. The only kind of leaving that I REALLY object to is when people do it without explanation. If someone explains why they have to leave and say they are sorry then it's not so bad.

Obviously Kamykos did nothing wrong at all.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 09 Jun 2012, 11:19
by Beerzoeper
The final judgement of the great Lewin. I have other ideas about it, but i think we have to except Lewin's explaination as a rule in the game, therefore, I won't build there anymore, and I hope others won't do that too. However, building towers near enemy buildings like barracks can not be a way to deal with this, never, I think.

Thanks for your comment Lewin

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 09 Jun 2012, 12:43
by Lewin
I'm not saying you can't build there, I'm undecided. It's a situation where you could argue it either way. You guys can decide your own rules, you play the game much more than I do ;)

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2012, 03:47
by Mulberry
I want to apologies if someone met one of the following guys who faked my nickname. I know i am responsible a bit for it, but i cant do anithing with them.

So i have 3 fakers. One guy is from Netherlands , Revo said his name but i cant remember it now. 2nd guy from Poland. I dont know his name (He join games with my nickname and leaves it imediatly after the start). And last one is russian player Koll with United Kingdoms flag. He is angry at me because i told players not to play with him for the reasons discussed here before.

Here is a screen made by To, from todays lobby( mention that he wrotes Mullbery instead of Mulberry ). Again sorry for everyone who was insulted by these fakers.

Image

At the moment this screen was made i was playing tournament game against Florek and Romek.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2012, 11:04
by sado1
I know i am responsible a bit for it, but i cant do anything with them..
You can't be responsible for someone faking your name, the fact that they are stupid doesn't make you guilty...

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2012, 20:39
by Beerzoeper
Yellow(me) trapped bye my 'ally' Senator Lipski. Don't get me wrong, he is a decent player, but not very social as you can see here, on maps like this:(.. but normally he's a good opponant.

Image

EDIT: You recognise Mulberries and Da Revolution's perfectly mirrored cities? (grey and white) Thats the way it should be!

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 09 Aug 2012, 11:38
by T*AnTi-V!RuZz
Today I played Mexican Boobs and Mexican tittibal.

When me and my ally were crushing them they called me names, cursed with diseases and said things about my mother.

Not that I actually care, but some of you may want to avoid them.

Re: Those who are jerks and why they would be

PostPosted: 09 Aug 2012, 13:35
by Da Revolution
Their names say enough to me.