Post 20 May 2009, 13:25 by Lewin
Nice! It looks very professional.
My comments:
- There are no bookmarks, which would be a useful feature of the PDF even though it's only shortish
- The disclaimer is written in quite informal language, perhaps some of it should be made slightly more formal? (ripping off is a bit ambiguous) I'm not saying write it in legal English though. What do other people think?
- Installation: "...the changes that this patch does": I don't like the "does". What about "...the changes that this patch makes to the game"?
- Overview: "All this and more gets explained throughout in the new and improved tutorial": I don't think throughout is the correct word. Shouldn't it be thoroughly or something?
- The links in FAQ should be made into blue clickable links.
I don't think the big change log is a problem. If you have bookmarks then people will be able to skip past it easily. Still, that's just my opinion.
Another thing not about the readme: I was just thinking: What will happen if someone tries to install the patch over a version of the game that has already been patched to 1.6? If you do this with the betas then I think it might have caused some issues with music files being updated and such.
I like it! Much nicer than the text file you had before.
Keep it up, and I'll try to get those sound effects done soon.
Lewin.